I've been hard into 2D the past few weeks. I've hit a wall with my latest bong sculpt and my progress in digital colouring has focused my waivering attention span there. I'm re-reading Adam Warren's [link] Empowered books, as this is a major inspiration for my own graphic novel dreams. I did a fan art image which has had a surprising number of faves, all by people who seem to be major bondage afficianados, judging by their galleries and other fave pics, but whatevs, it's all good. Any publicity is good publicity and I think becoming a fan of Empowered has given me an appreciation for that particular form of sexual deviation, so it would be hypocritical of me to get weirded out by other bondage fans showing an interest in this particular image.
Anyhow, I got thinking about Adam Warren's policy of showing sex and nudity in his work, without actually showing sex and nudity in his work, and I really think his decision to take the high road is the best way to go. I mean, as far back as highschool, I'd have kids looking at my drawings and saying "do you ever draw porn? Man if I could draw like you, I would totally draw porn". I'm only a little ashamed to admit that I've dabbled in erotic art, and I know that people, including myself, like smut. But I think, with the eventual goal of making and maybe even selling a graphic novel, I might do better to go with the sex without sex, nudity without nudity approach that Warren takes with his Empowered books. That way, my work has a chance of appearing in comic stores instead of porn shops. Of course, I would never completely rule out the occaisional unpublished naughty picture. There's a time and a place for smut, and it's called the internet.